Whatever you say, Phillip Morris

call-for-philip-morrisI noted in a previous post (The Altria Earnings Protection Act) that Philip Morris, the major player in the U.S. tobacco industry, was fully supportive of the upcoming Congressional bill that will give the FDA control over tobacco. At the time it seemed to make sense that “Altria,” the newly sanitized name for the same company we used to call Philip Morris, would support the bill, since it gave them an economic advantage against their competitors, who oppose it.

The bill has now emerged from the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP). In the final rancorous days of disagreement among committee members, the ranking Republican Senator, Mike Enzi, revealed that Philip Morris was not only involved in negotiating the bill, but was actually a co-author. “We need to fight the war on tobacco head on, not sign a peace treaty with Philip Morris, one of the authors and strongest supporters of this bill.” This was not a casual comment where the Senator might have been speaking figuratively. This was in an official post on the HELP Committee website.

Enzi proposed placing tobacco regulation under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), where decisions would be made using “science, not politics.” He believed the FDA, concerned with restoring health and keeping the nation’s food supply safe, was not the appropriate organization. Said Enzi: “[The] FDA approves cures, not poisons.”

The Senate HELP committee approved the legislation on May 21 by a vote of 15-8, and it will now be debated by the full Senate. Press coverage was favorable: “Ending Big Tobacco’s Quest for Its Next Generation of Smokers Now in Hands of the U.S. Senate.” The House of Representatives had already approved similar legislation on April 2 by a vote of 298-112. President Obama supports FDA regulation of tobacco.

Philip Morris has spent $3 million on lobbying so far this year, and it spent $7.2 million last year. That’s bound to buy them some satisfaction when it comes to tobacco legislation. Unfortunately, as Enzi puts it in the headline of his press release, making a peace treaty with Philip Morris is not the way to win the war on tobacco. Allowing Philip Morris to “co-author” the regulatory bill goes way too far. As Dr. Michael Siegel describes it on his blog, not only was the fox guarding the henhouse. Congress allowed the fox to write the rules that govern how this henhouse will continue to be guarded.

Sources:

Mike Enzi, Peace Treaty with Philip Morris No Way to Win War on Tobacco, Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, May 20, 2009

Share

Sorry, comments are closed for this post.

Skip to toolbar